Fiona Chong

Call

2015 (Hong Kong)

Languages

English, Cantonese, Mandarin

Areas of Practice

Companies
Conflicts of Law
Contract
Equity & Trusts
Family & Matrimonial Law
Injunction & Contempt
Mediation
Mental Health
Probate & Succession
Property & Land

Contact

Email: [email protected]

Secretary: Ms. Suki Wong
[email protected]

Fiona has a broad civil practice which includes family/matrimonial, building management, land and general civil cases. In particular, Fiona regularly advises on and appears in hearings involving main suit, ancillary relief and children matters in the Family Court. She also has experience in obtaining and resisting urgent injunctions in the Family Court and the High Court.

Fiona is recognised in Doyle’s Guide 2026 as a Recommended Junior Counsel in the category of Leading Family & Divorce Law Barristers.

Fiona is fluent in English and Cantonese. She is capable of written work and advocacy in both English and Chinese.

  • LL.B., The University of Hong Kong (2013)
  • P.C.LL., The University of Hong Kong (2014)
  • The Helen A. Lo Prize in Principles of Family Law (2013)
  • Member, Bar Council (2019-2021)
  • Chairman, Standing Committee on Young Barristers (2019-2021)
  • LWS v TMLT [2025] HKFC 183: Acted for the Respondent Father in the trial of an application for child maintenance by the Applicant Mother, and successfully resisting the Mother’s claim for alleged past therapy expenses on the basis that the Mother’s choice of therapy provider was unreasonable and that the Mother failed to prove that she had actually made such payment
  • PFX v XKJ [2026] 1 HKLRD 599, [2025] HKFC 154 (with Mr. Eugene Yim): Acted for the Respondent Husband in setting aside the ex parte leave granted to the Applicant Wife under Part IIA of the MPPO and dismissing the Wife’s application for want of jurisdiction
  • 譚 及 林 [2025] HKFC 144, [2025] HKFC 145: Acted for the Petitioner Wife in the trial of the Wife’s application for committal against the Respondent Husband for his failure to comply with undertakings to pay children expenses and Orders to pay maintenance
  • NCKP v CMY [2025] HKCA 850: Acted for the Petitioner Husband in resisting the Respondent’s Wife’s application for leave to appeal against an Order under section 23 of the MPPO for the Wife to make repayment of maintenance paid following the Husband’s discovery of the Wife’s remarriage
  • CFC v HYS [2025] HKFC 87: Acted for the Respondent Husband in resisting the Applicant Wife’s application for maintenance pending suit and legal costs provision in the total sum of HK$800,000 a month
  • HSCC v SWKA [2025] HKFC 71: Acted for the Petitioner Husband in the ancillary relief trial, a major issue of which was whether the parties’ respective loans from family members / family members’ companies should be taken into account
  • YWS v SJ [2025] 2 HKLRD 921, [2025] HKFC 10: Acted for the Respondent Husband in the trial of the Husband’s application for variation of monthly maintenance payable to the Petitioner Wife
  • RM (aka RH) v SRM [2024] HKFC 189: Acted for the Petitioner Mother in the trial of the Mother’s application for relocation of the younger son of the family to Japan
  • Lam Fung Sin v Lee Yuet Wing [2024] 1 HKLRD 782, [2024] HKFC 33: Acted for the Defendant Husband in appealing against the Order of a Master dismissing his application to stay District Court proceedings pending determination of his application for ancillary relief against the Plaintiff Wife in the Family Court
  • ZXW v PKP & Anor [2023] HKFC 51: Acted for the Respondent Wife in the trial of the preliminary issue claim by the father of the Petitioner Husband and the ancillary relief application for herself and the two children of the family
  • 譚 及 黃 [2019] HKFC 80: Acted for the Respondent Mother in obtaining joint custody and sole care and control of the two children of the family following a 10 day trial
  • YKY v WSM [2018] HKFC [224] (led by Mr. Selwyn Yu SC and with Mr. Eugene Yim): Acted for the Petitioner Wife in resisting the Respondent Husband’s application for leave to have the Decree Nisi be made absolute pursuant to section 17(2)(a) of the MCO