邱浚峯 大律師

认许年份

2020 (香港)

专业资格

会员,特许仲裁师公会 (2022)
Insolvency Preparatory I & II 课程证书 (专项文凭(破产重整)之一部分),香港会计师公会 (2018, 2022)
认可民事及商事调解员,调解员学会 (英国) (2019)
香港证券及投资学会从业员资格证书 (证券; 机构融资) (2015)

语言

英语
广东话
普通话

执业范畴

仲裁
中国习俗法律
商业/银行法
公司法
強制土地出售
建筑
雇佣法
衡平法 /信讬
破产清盘
知识产权
收回土地及补偿
精神健康
遗产/继承
财产/土地
公法/司法复核
不当得利

联络

秘书:Ms. Karen Leung
[email protected]

邱浚峯大律师专注于民商事诉讼领域的业务,尤其是涉及公司及商事的争议、清盘及破产程序、土地、房地产、遗嘱认证、信托以及公法等事宜。 同时,他亦正积极拓展国际商业仲裁的业务,并为英国特许仲裁师公会之会员。

邱大律师经常被委聘独自或协助较其资深的大律师出席高等法院(包括上诉法庭)、区域法院、土地审裁处以及仲裁聆讯。 同时,他亦擅于草拟法律文件以及提供书面法律意见。 自执业以来,他累积了处理审讯、各种非正审申请、讼费评定程序以及法定上诉的广泛经验。

邱大律师亦经常与由御用大律师或资深大律师领导的法律团队合作处理复杂以及高金额的诉讼,而该些诉讼往往牵涉上市公司以及跨境的元素(包括外国法的适用及冲突法的议题)。 另外,他的案件亦屡因牵涉较重要的法律议题而被汇报于《香港法律汇报与摘录》(Hong Kong Law Reports &Digest)及《香港案件》(Hong Kong Cases )。

邱大律师以全级第三名毕业于香港大学法律学院,并曾连续三年获授予院长荣誉名单。 他其后负笈伦敦大学国王学院修习法律硕士,并以全级首名毕业,获授予潘迪生法律学院奖。 他亦在信托法、仲裁法、信息法及以国际私法为题的论文取得「优异」成绩,并代表伦敦大学国王学院参与Willem C. Vis国际商事仲裁模拟仲裁庭比赛。

除此之外,在执业之前,邱大律师曾为终审法院前常任法官烈显伦御用大律师的研究助理达三年。 同时,他亦曾经协助香港大学法律学院进行信托及精神健康法的法律研究项目。

邱大律师师从彭耀鸿资深大律师、严斯泰大律师、麦业成大律师、伍颕珊大律师、陈星光大律师及杜中大律师。

邱大律师在香港长大及接受教育,他能娴熟地运用中文草拟法律文件及于法庭陈词。

伦敦大学国王学院法律硕士
香港大学法律专业证书
香港大学法律学士
香港大学工商管理学士(法律)
圣若瑟书院

潘迪生法律学院奖 (2019)
最佳辩论员季军,第16届亚太区红十字国际人道法模拟法庭比赛 (2018)
罗文惠纪念奖学金 (2017)
院长荣誉名单 (2015, 2016, 2017)
陈震夏奖学金 (2012)

  • Contributor, Lexis Advance® Hong Kong Practical Guidance on “Intestacy” and “Will Drafting” by LexisNexis

Company & Commercial Disputes

  • Target Insurance Company Limited v Ng Yu & Ors [2022] HKCFI 1362, appeared for the former Chairman of Target Insurance Company Limited in successfully obtaining an interim stay of the disclosure order pending the determination of a summons to discharge an ex parte Mareva injunction for a claim of US$150 million and continue to act for the 1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants in the matter (led by Robert Pang SC)
  • Re Ashit Sud (Debtor) [2022] HKCFI 1269, reported at [2022] 2 HKLRD 898, appeared for the company and the debtor in resisting a winding-up petition for a debt of US$30 million on the ground that the creditor has rejected a reasonable offer to compromise and secure under s.178 (1)(a)(ii) of the Companies (Winding up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32) and s.6D(3) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) (as sole counsel)
  • Ngan In Leng & Ors v Chu Yuet Wah [2022] HKCFI 558, appeared in a 10-day trial for the Defendant in successfully resisting a claim of over HK$250 million involving a dispute arising from an acquisition of the interest in a hotel-cum-casino in Macao (led by Robert Whitehead SC and with Vincent Chen)
  • Perpetual Trust Limited (as Administrator of the Estate of Alexander Gavin Brown) v Kobe Investments Limited (HCA 1353/2021) [pending judgment], appeared for the majority shareholder of an Australian listed company in resisting a proprietary claim by a foreign administrator in respect of shares with a value of around AUD$250 million (led by Marc Corlett QC)
  • Realord Group Holdings Limited & Anor v Win Dynamic Limited & Anor (HCA 716/2021): Acting for the plaintiffs in enforcing a deed of gift under which an offeree undertook to advance the whole consideration of over HK$250 million under a voluntary general offer to the company (led by Jin Pao SC and with Vincent Chen)
  • Li Ngan Kwan v Gao Li Hui & Anor (HCA 276/2007): Acting for the 1st Defendant in defending a claim to set aside a gift of a controlling interest in a hotel in Shenzhen of a value of over RMB¥300 million on the ground of forgery and breach of fiduciary duties (with Andrew Mak)
  • Advising a creditor on the validity and effect of a clause in a guarantee which limits the operation of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) in a claim of over US$15 million (led by Marc Corlett QC)
  • Acting for a minority shareholder of a BVI company in enforcing a right of pre-emption under a shareholders’ agreement governed by Hong Kong law, which has been triggered by a sale and purchase agreement governed by Italian law (as sole counsel)
  • Acting for a listed company in reviewing the taxation of former provisional liquidators’ bill (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a financial services company on the applicability of various exemptions under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) to deal in and advise on securities (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a cell-based food company on a dispute with an angel investor arising out of a SAFE (simple agreement for future equity) agreement (as sole counsel)
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) joint venture or partnership disputes, (ii) investment agreement disputes and (iii) various winding-up and bankruptcy proceedings, including but not limited to setting-aside of statutory demands and review of remuneration of provisional liquidators

General Civil Disputes

  • Thapa Kamala v Tong Ming Kay & Ors [2021] HKCFI 2371, appeared for the 3rd and 4th defendants in successfully striking out claims of malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office on the ground of, inter alia, the action being a collateral attack of a ruling of a magistrate in a criminal trial (led by Robert Pang SC) 
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) employment disputes and (ii) debt recovery actions

Arbitration

  • HKIAC Rules, acted for a PRC beverage company in defending a claim of over US$450 million, which involved various interim proceedings such as applications for injunctive relief, joinder, jurisdictional challenge, etc. (with Vincent Chen)
  • Advised a PRC media company on the recoverability of damages for over RMB¥170 million arising from a breach of an investment agreement (led by Robert Whitehead SC)

Will, Trust & Probate

  • Lui Ming Lok v Ng Im Fong Loretta, the Executrix of the Estate of Lui Kwan Cheung, Decease (CACV 418/2020) [pending judgment], appeared for the defendant in resisting an appeal on the question of whether section 20(2)(c) and (d) of the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance (Cap. 179) provides a comprehensive code for all forms and degrees of mental issues where a marriage might be affected by “unsoundness of mind” (led by Robert Pang SC)
  • Cheung Siu Ling & Ors v Tse Yuk Lin & Anor [2021] HKDC 1290, appeared for the plaintiffs in successfully applying for, inter alia, a representation order on the ground that an action to assert a right of way is connected with the proper administration of a deceased’s estate (with Valentine Yim)
  • Acted for a committee appointed under the Mental Health Ordinance (Cap. 136) on whether an action/ application brought by a committee before the sanction of the mental health court has been obtained is valid (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a beneficiary on the enforceability of a deed of family arrangement

Property & Conveyancing

  • Wong Anita Shu Ting v Yuen Yiu Chung [2022] HKCFI 209, reported at [2022] 2 HKC 499, appeared for the respondent in a vendor and purchaser summons on whether a joint tenancy has been severed by an order of the Family Court without a deed of release (with Valentine Yim) 
  • To Ying Fat (杜英發) v 陳偉昌 [2022] HKDC 502, appeared for the plaintiff in successfully appealing against an order setting aside a default judgment on the ground that a lease has been determined by effluxion of time, which is not affected by a Modification of Tenancy (as sole counsel)
  • Acting for a squatter the family of whom has been in possession of various land lots in Tuen Mun for over a century in an adverse possession claim against the Government (with Valentine Yim)
  • Acted for the 2nd Defendant in resisting an application of injunction restraining the son of the former abbot of a temple who claims a life interest in remaining in possession of part of the property within the temple (as sole counsel)
  • Acted for an owner in a compulsory sale proceedings involving a redevelopment project in Kowloon Tong (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a property developer on the existence of a right of way over a common staircase shared by two tenement buildings in a redevelopment project (with Valentine Yim)
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) conveyancing disputes, (ii) claims of adverse possession and various rights of easement (including right of way, drainage easement, etc), (iii) Chinese customary law, in particular the administration of tso/ tong affairs, (iv) disputes involving the development of small houses in the New Territories, (v) co-ownership disputes (including applications under the Partition Ordinance (Cap. 352)), (vi) alleged non-compliance of conditions under leases, guesthouse licences, etc., (vii) building management disputes (including water-seepage)

Civil Procedure 

  • Li Ngan Kwan & Ors v Gao Li Hui & Ors [2021] HKCFI 2878; [2022] HKCFI 171, appeared for the 1stand 2nd defendants in successfully resisting an application by the plaintiff to amend a pre-CJR statement of claim on the grounds of inexplicable delay and inconsistency with earlier pleadings; leave to appeal at the Court of First Instance by the plaintiff refused (with Andrew Mak)

Judicial review