邱浚峯 大律師

認許年份

2020 (香港)

專業資格

會員,特許仲裁師公會 (2022)
Insolvency Preparatory I & II 課程證書 (專項文憑(破產重整)之一部分),香港會計師公會 (2018, 2022)
認可民事及商事調解員,調解員學會 (英國) (2019)
香港證券及投資學會從業員資格證書 (證券; 機構融資) (2015)

語言

英語
廣東話
普通話

執業範疇

仲裁
中國習俗法律
商業 / 銀行法
公司法
強制土地出售
建築
僱傭法
衡平法 / 信託
破產清盤
知識產權
收回土地及土地補償
精神健康
遺產 / 繼承
財產 / 土地
公法 / 司法覆核
不當得利

聯絡

秘書:Ms. Karen Leung
[email protected]

邱浚峯大律師專注於民商事訴訟領域的業務,尤其是涉及公司及商事的爭議、清盤及破產程序、土地、房地產、遺囑認證、信託以及公法等事宜。同時,他亦正積極拓展國際商業仲裁的業務,并為英國特許仲裁師公會之會員。

邱大律師經常被委聘獨自或協助較其資深的大律師出席高等法院(包括上訴法庭)、區域法院、土地審裁處以及仲裁聆訊。同時,他亦擅於草擬法律文件以及提供書面法律意見。自執業以來,他累積了處理審訊、各種非正審申請、訟費評定程序以及法定上訴的廣泛經驗。

邱大律師亦經常與由御用大律師或資深大律師領導的法律團隊合作處理複雜以及高金額的訴訟,而該些訴訟往往牽涉上市公司以及跨境的元素(包括外國法的適用及衝突法的議題)。另外,他的案件亦屢因牽涉較重要的法律議題而被彙報於《香港法律匯報與摘錄》(Hong Kong Law Reports & Digest)及《香港案件》(Hong Kong Cases)。

邱大律師以全級第三名畢業於香港大學法律學院,並曾連續三年獲授予院長榮譽名單。他其後負笈倫敦大學國王學院修習法律碩士,並以全級首名畢業,獲授予「潘迪生法律學院獎」。他亦在信託法、仲裁法、資訊法及以國際私法為題的論文取得「優異」成績。在學期間,他代表倫敦大學國王學院參與Willem C. Vis國際商事仲裁模擬仲裁庭比賽及代表香港大學參與紅十字國際人道法模擬法庭比賽。

除此之外,在執業之前,邱大律師曾為終審法院前常任法官烈顯倫御用大律師的研究助理達三年。同時,他亦曾經協助香港大學法律學院進行信託及精神健康法的法律研究項目。

邱大律師師從彭耀鴻資深大律師、嚴斯泰大律師、麥業成大律師、伍頴珊大律師、陳星光大律師及杜中大律師。

邱大律師在香港長大及接受教育,他能嫻熟地運用中文草擬法律文件及於法庭陳詞。

倫敦大學國王學院法律碩士
香港大學法律專業證書
香港大學法律學士
香港大學工商管理學士(法律)
聖若瑟書院

潘迪生法律學院獎 (2019)
最佳辯論員季軍,第16屆亞太區紅十字國際人道法模擬法庭比賽 (2018)
羅文惠紀念獎學金 (2017)
院長榮譽名單 (2015, 2016, 2017)
陳震夏獎學金 (2012)

  • Contributor, Lexis Advance® Hong Kong Practical Guidance on “Intestacy” and “Will Drafting” by LexisNexis

Company & Commercial Disputes

  • Target Insurance Company Limited v Ng Yu & Ors [2022] HKCFI 1362, appeared for the former Chairman of Target Insurance Company Limited in successfully obtaining an interim stay of the disclosure order pending the determination of a summons to discharge an ex parte Mareva injunction for a claim of US$150 million and continue to act for the 1st, 3rd and 4th Defendants in the matter (led by Robert Pang SC)
  • Re Ashit Sud (Debtor) [2022] HKCFI 1269, reported at [2022] 2 HKLRD 898, appeared for the company and the debtor in resisting a winding-up petition for a debt of US$30 million on the ground that the creditor has rejected a reasonable offer to compromise and secure under s.178 (1)(a)(ii) of the Companies (Winding up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32) and s.6D(3) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) (as sole counsel)
  • Ngan In Leng & Ors v Chu Yuet Wah [2022] HKCFI 558, appeared in a 10-day trial for the Defendant in successfully resisting a claim of over HK$250 million involving a dispute arising from an acquisition of the interest in a hotel-cum-casino in Macao (led by Robert Whitehead SC and with Vincent Chen)
  • Perpetual Trust Limited (as Administrator of the Estate of Alexander Gavin Brown) v Kobe Investments Limited (HCA 1353/2021) [pending judgment], appeared for the majority shareholder of an Australian listed company in resisting a proprietary claim by a foreign administrator in respect of shares with a value of around AUD$250 million (led by Marc Corlett QC)
  • Realord Group Holdings Limited & Anor v Win Dynamic Limited & Anor (HCA 716/2021): Acting for the plaintiffs in enforcing a deed of gift under which an offeree undertook to advance the whole consideration of over HK$250 million under a voluntary general offer to the company (led by Jin Pao SC and with Vincent Chen)
  • Li Ngan Kwan v Gao Li Hui & Anor (HCA 276/2007): Acting for the 1st Defendant in defending a claim to set aside a gift of a controlling interest in a hotel in Shenzhen of a value of over RMB¥300 million on the ground of forgery and breach of fiduciary duties (with Andrew Mak)
  • Advising a creditor on the validity and effect of a clause in a guarantee which limits the operation of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) in a claim of over US$15 million (led by Marc Corlett QC)
  • Acting for a minority shareholder of a BVI company in enforcing a right of pre-emption under a shareholders’ agreement governed by Hong Kong law, which has been triggered by a sale and purchase agreement governed by Italian law (as sole counsel)
  • Acting for a listed company in reviewing the taxation of former provisional liquidators’ bill (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a financial services company on the applicability of various exemptions under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) to deal in and advise on securities (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a cell-based food company on a dispute with an angel investor arising out of a SAFE (simple agreement for future equity) agreement (as sole counsel)
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) joint venture or partnership disputes, (ii) investment agreement disputes and (iii) various winding-up and bankruptcy proceedings, including but not limited to setting-aside of statutory demands and review of remuneration of provisional liquidators

General Civil Disputes

  • Thapa Kamala v Tong Ming Kay & Ors [2021] HKCFI 2371, appeared for the 3rd and 4th defendants in successfully striking out claims of malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office on the ground of, inter alia, the action being a collateral attack of a ruling of a magistrate in a criminal trial (led by Robert Pang SC) 
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) employment disputes and (ii) debt recovery actions

Arbitration

  • HKIAC Rules, acted for a PRC beverage company in defending a claim of over US$450 million, which involved various interim proceedings such as applications for injunctive relief, joinder, jurisdictional challenge, etc. (with Vincent Chen)
  • Advised a PRC media company on the recoverability of damages for over RMB¥170 million arising from a breach of an investment agreement (led by Robert Whitehead SC)

Will, Trust & Probate

  • Lui Ming Lok v Ng Im Fong Loretta, the Executrix of the Estate of Lui Kwan Cheung, Decease (CACV 418/2020) [pending judgment], appeared for the defendant in resisting an appeal on the question of whether section 20(2)(c) and (d) of the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance (Cap. 179) provides a comprehensive code for all forms and degrees of mental issues where a marriage might be affected by “unsoundness of mind” (led by Robert Pang SC)
  • Cheung Siu Ling & Ors v Tse Yuk Lin & Anor [2021] HKDC 1290, appeared for the plaintiffs in successfully applying for, inter alia, a representation order on the ground that an action to assert a right of way is connected with the proper administration of a deceased’s estate (with Valentine Yim)
  • Acted for a committee appointed under the Mental Health Ordinance (Cap. 136) on whether an action/ application brought by a committee before the sanction of the mental health court has been obtained is valid (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a beneficiary on the enforceability of a deed of family arrangement

Property & Conveyancing

  • Wong Anita Shu Ting v Yuen Yiu Chung [2022] HKCFI 209, reported at [2022] 2 HKC 499, appeared for the respondent in a vendor and purchaser summons on whether a joint tenancy has been severed by an order of the Family Court without a deed of release (with Valentine Yim) 
  • To Ying Fat (杜英發) v 陳偉昌 [2022] HKDC 502, appeared for the plaintiff in successfully appealing against an order setting aside a default judgment on the ground that a lease has been determined by effluxion of time, which is not affected by a Modification of Tenancy (as sole counsel)
  • Acting for a squatter the family of whom has been in possession of various land lots in Tuen Mun for over a century in an adverse possession claim against the Government (with Valentine Yim)
  • Acted for the 2nd Defendant in resisting an application of injunction restraining the son of the former abbot of a temple who claims a life interest in remaining in possession of part of the property within the temple (as sole counsel)
  • Acted for an owner in a compulsory sale proceedings involving a redevelopment project in Kowloon Tong (as sole counsel)
  • Advised a property developer on the existence of a right of way over a common staircase shared by two tenement buildings in a redevelopment project (with Valentine Yim)
  • More generally, advising on and/or acting for parties in relation to (i) conveyancing disputes, (ii) claims of adverse possession and various rights of easement (including right of way, drainage easement, etc), (iii) Chinese customary law, in particular the administration of tso/ tong affairs, (iv) disputes involving the development of small houses in the New Territories, (v) co-ownership disputes (including applications under the Partition Ordinance (Cap. 352)), (vi) alleged non-compliance of conditions under leases, guesthouse licences, etc., (vii) building management disputes (including water-seepage)

Civil Procedure 

  • Li Ngan Kwan & Ors v Gao Li Hui & Ors [2021] HKCFI 2878; [2022] HKCFI 171, appeared for the 1stand 2nd defendants in successfully resisting an application by the plaintiff to amend a pre-CJR statement of claim on the grounds of inexplicable delay and inconsistency with earlier pleadings; leave to appeal at the Court of First Instance by the plaintiff refused (with Andrew Mak)

Judicial review